Skip to main content

Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect: Insurance Risk Comparison

Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD): -26 pts Ford Transit Connect is riskier by 26 index points. MOT fail-rate difference: -19.3 pp. From 26,016,787 DVSA MOT tests (2016, OGL v3.0).

Which is riskier to insure — the Nissan Qashqai or the Ford Transit Connect?

The Ford Transit Connect (GVRI 54/100) is 26 index points riskier than the Nissan Qashqai (GVRI 28/100) according to the Gera Risk Comparison Delta — a 19.3 percentage-point difference in MOT fail rates from 2016 DVSA data. UK fleet average GVRI: 37/100. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT data (2016), OGL v3.0.

Source:DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results — DfT·as of 2016updated annually (last: )
Gera Risk Comparison Delta-26 ptsNissan Qashqai (GVRI 28/100) vs Ford Transit Connect (GVRI 54/100). Source: DVSA MOT 2016, OGL v3.0.How this index is calculated

Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect: side-by-side risk data (2016)

Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect — DVSA MOT 2016 (OGL v3.0)
MeasureNissan QashqaiFord Transit ConnectDifference (A − B)
Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI)28/10054/100-26 pts
Risk bandLow RiskModerate RiskFord Transit Connect riskier
MOT fail rate19.0%38.3%-19.3 pp
MOT tests in dataset205,482123,441
Failed tests39,11447,317
Avg defect severity1.041.041=std, 3=dangerous
vs UK fleet GVRI (37/100)-9 pts below avg+17 pts above avg

GRCD = GVRI(A) − GVRI(B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, 0–100. Class-4 (car) normal tests only. N ≥ 30. Source: DVSA MOT 2016, OGL v3.0.

Try the live comparison tool

Compare any two UK cars head-to-head by Gera Risk Comparison Delta.

Car A

Car B

Select two cars to compare their Gera Risk Comparison Delta — computed from 26,016,787 real DVSA MOT tests.

Get insurance quotes for the Nissan Qashqai — lower-risk by 26 GVRI points

The Nissan Qashqai (GVRI 28/100) is 26 index points lower-risk than the Ford Transit Connect from DVSA MOT data. GeraSure is building data-driven insurance comparison using real GVRI data. Join the waitlist to see what that means for your premium.

More Nissan Qashqai comparisons

More Ford Transit Connect comparisons

Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect insurance risk: frequently asked questions

What is the Gera Risk Comparison Delta for the Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect?
The Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD) for the Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect is -26 index points, computed from GVRI(Nissan Qashqai) = 28/100 and GVRI(Ford Transit Connect) = 54/100. The Ford Transit Connect is the higher-risk model by 26 GVRI points based on DVSA MOT 2016 data (OGL v3.0).
What is the Nissan Qashqai GVRI?
The Nissan Qashqai Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 28/100 (Low Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 19.0% from 205,482 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
What is the Ford Transit Connect GVRI?
The Ford Transit Connect Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 54/100 (Moderate Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 38.3% from 123,441 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
Which is cheaper to insure, the Nissan Qashqai or Ford Transit Connect?
Based on DVSA MOT data, the Nissan Qashqai (GVRI 28/100, Low Risk) has a lower modelled insurance risk than the Ford Transit Connect (GVRI 54/100) by 26 index points — a 19.3 percentage-point MOT fail-rate difference. However, actual premiums also depend on driver age, no-claims bonus, postcode, annual mileage and policy type.
How is the GRCD calculated?
GRCD = GVRI(Car A) − GVRI(Car B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100. All inputs are from the DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results dataset (2016, OGL v3.0). Only make+model combinations with N ≥ 30 tests are included. Full methodology is on the Gera Risk Comparison Delta methodology page.

Methodology

The Gera Risk Comparison Delta for Nissan Qashqai vs Ford Transit Connect is the difference between their GVRI scores: GRCD = GVRI(Nissan Qashqai) − GVRI(Ford Transit Connect) = 28 54 = -26 pts. GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100, from DVSA Anonymised MOT Tests (class-4, 2016, OGL v3.0). Full formula and verification steps on the methodology page.

Contains public sector information published by Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results — DfT (2016, published 2016).