Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit: Insurance Risk Comparison
Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD): +7 pts — Peugeot 206 is riskier by 7 index points. MOT fail-rate difference: +5.5 pp. From 26,016,787 DVSA MOT tests (2016, OGL v3.0).
Which is riskier to insure — the Peugeot 206 or the Ford Transit?
The Peugeot 206 (GVRI 58/100) is 7 index points riskier than the Ford Transit (GVRI 51/100) according to the Gera Risk Comparison Delta — a 5.5 percentage-point difference in MOT fail rates from 2016 DVSA data. UK fleet average GVRI: 37/100. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT data (2016), OGL v3.0.
Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit: side-by-side risk data (2016)
| Measure | Peugeot 206 | Ford Transit | Difference (A − B) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) | 58/100 | 51/100 | +7 pts |
| Risk band | High Risk | Moderate Risk | Peugeot 206 riskier |
| MOT fail rate | 41.5% | 36.0% | +5.5 pp |
| MOT tests in dataset | 331,122 | 266,761 | — |
| Failed tests | 137,347 | 96,072 | — |
| Avg defect severity | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1=std, 3=dangerous |
| vs UK fleet GVRI (37/100) | +21 pts above avg | +14 pts above avg | — |
GRCD = GVRI(A) − GVRI(B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, 0–100. Class-4 (car) normal tests only. N ≥ 30. Source: DVSA MOT 2016, OGL v3.0.
Try the live comparison tool
Compare any two UK cars head-to-head by Gera Risk Comparison Delta.
Car A
Car B
Select two cars to compare their Gera Risk Comparison Delta — computed from 26,016,787 real DVSA MOT tests.
Get insurance quotes for the Ford Transit — lower-risk by 7 GVRI points
The Ford Transit (GVRI 51/100) is 7 index points lower-risk than the Peugeot 206 from DVSA MOT data. GeraSure is building data-driven insurance comparison using real GVRI data. Join the waitlist to see what that means for your premium.
More Peugeot 206 comparisons
More Ford Transit comparisons
Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit insurance risk: frequently asked questions
- What is the Gera Risk Comparison Delta for the Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit?
- The Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD) for the Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit is +7 index points, computed from GVRI(Peugeot 206) = 58/100 and GVRI(Ford Transit) = 51/100. The Peugeot 206 is the higher-risk model by 7 GVRI points based on DVSA MOT 2016 data (OGL v3.0).
- What is the Peugeot 206 GVRI?
- The Peugeot 206 Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 58/100 (High Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 41.5% from 331,122 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- What is the Ford Transit GVRI?
- The Ford Transit Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 51/100 (Moderate Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 36.0% from 266,761 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- Which is cheaper to insure, the Peugeot 206 or Ford Transit?
- Based on DVSA MOT data, the Ford Transit (GVRI 51/100, Moderate Risk) has a lower modelled insurance risk than the Peugeot 206 (GVRI 58/100) by 7 index points — a 5.5 percentage-point MOT fail-rate difference. However, actual premiums also depend on driver age, no-claims bonus, postcode, annual mileage and policy type.
- How is the GRCD calculated?
- GRCD = GVRI(Car A) − GVRI(Car B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100. All inputs are from the DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results dataset (2016, OGL v3.0). Only make+model combinations with N ≥ 30 tests are included. Full methodology is on the Gera Risk Comparison Delta methodology page.
Methodology
The Gera Risk Comparison Delta for Peugeot 206 vs Ford Transit is the difference between their GVRI scores: GRCD = GVRI(Peugeot 206) − GVRI(Ford Transit) = 58 − 51 = +7 pts. GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100, from DVSA Anonymised MOT Tests (class-4, 2016, OGL v3.0). Full formula and verification steps on the methodology page.
Contains public sector information published by Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results — DfT (2016, published 2016).