Renault Clio vs Ford Ka: Insurance Risk Comparison
Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD): +4 pts — Renault Clio is riskier by 4 index points. MOT fail-rate difference: +2.7 pp. From 26,016,787 DVSA MOT tests (2016, OGL v3.0).
Which is riskier to insure — the Renault Clio or the Ford Ka?
The Renault Clio (GVRI 58/100) is 4 index points riskier than the Ford Ka (GVRI 54/100) according to the Gera Risk Comparison Delta — a 2.7 percentage-point difference in MOT fail rates from 2016 DVSA data. UK fleet average GVRI: 37/100. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT data (2016), OGL v3.0.
Renault Clio vs Ford Ka: side-by-side risk data (2016)
| Measure | Renault Clio | Ford Ka | Difference (A − B) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) | 58/100 | 54/100 | +4 pts |
| Risk band | High Risk | Moderate Risk | Renault Clio riskier |
| MOT fail rate | 40.8% | 38.0% | +2.7 pp |
| MOT tests in dataset | 487,303 | 304,663 | — |
| Failed tests | 198,732 | 115,873 | — |
| Avg defect severity | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1=std, 3=dangerous |
| vs UK fleet GVRI (37/100) | +21 pts above avg | +17 pts above avg | — |
GRCD = GVRI(A) − GVRI(B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, 0–100. Class-4 (car) normal tests only. N ≥ 30. Source: DVSA MOT 2016, OGL v3.0.
Try the live comparison tool
Compare any two UK cars head-to-head by Gera Risk Comparison Delta.
Car A
Car B
Select two cars to compare their Gera Risk Comparison Delta — computed from 26,016,787 real DVSA MOT tests.
Get insurance quotes for the Ford Ka — lower-risk by 4 GVRI points
The Ford Ka (GVRI 54/100) is 4 index points lower-risk than the Renault Clio from DVSA MOT data. GeraSure is building data-driven insurance comparison using real GVRI data. Join the waitlist to see what that means for your premium.
More Renault Clio comparisons
More Ford Ka comparisons
Renault Clio vs Ford Ka insurance risk: frequently asked questions
- What is the Gera Risk Comparison Delta for the Renault Clio vs Ford Ka?
- The Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD) for the Renault Clio vs Ford Ka is +4 index points, computed from GVRI(Renault Clio) = 58/100 and GVRI(Ford Ka) = 54/100. The Renault Clio is the higher-risk model by 4 GVRI points based on DVSA MOT 2016 data (OGL v3.0).
- What is the Renault Clio GVRI?
- The Renault Clio Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 58/100 (High Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 40.8% from 487,303 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- What is the Ford Ka GVRI?
- The Ford Ka Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 54/100 (Moderate Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 38.0% from 304,663 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- Which is cheaper to insure, the Renault Clio or Ford Ka?
- Based on DVSA MOT data, the Ford Ka (GVRI 54/100, Moderate Risk) has a lower modelled insurance risk than the Renault Clio (GVRI 58/100) by 4 index points — a 2.7 percentage-point MOT fail-rate difference. However, actual premiums also depend on driver age, no-claims bonus, postcode, annual mileage and policy type.
- How is the GRCD calculated?
- GRCD = GVRI(Car A) − GVRI(Car B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100. All inputs are from the DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results dataset (2016, OGL v3.0). Only make+model combinations with N ≥ 30 tests are included. Full methodology is on the Gera Risk Comparison Delta methodology page.
Methodology
The Gera Risk Comparison Delta for Renault Clio vs Ford Ka is the difference between their GVRI scores: GRCD = GVRI(Renault Clio) − GVRI(Ford Ka) = 58 − 54 = +4 pts. GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100, from DVSA Anonymised MOT Tests (class-4, 2016, OGL v3.0). Full formula and verification steps on the methodology page.
Contains public sector information published by Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results — DfT (2016, published 2016).