Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo: Insurance Risk Comparison
Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD): -4 pts — Ford Mondeo is riskier by 4 index points. MOT fail-rate difference: -1.9 pp. From 26,016,787 DVSA MOT tests (2016, OGL v3.0).
Which is riskier to insure — the Vauxhall Astra or the Ford Mondeo?
The Ford Mondeo (GVRI 48/100) is 4 index points riskier than the Vauxhall Astra (GVRI 44/100) according to the Gera Risk Comparison Delta — a 1.9 percentage-point difference in MOT fail rates from 2016 DVSA data. UK fleet average GVRI: 37/100. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT data (2016), OGL v3.0.
Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo: side-by-side risk data (2016)
| Measure | Vauxhall Astra | Ford Mondeo | Difference (A − B) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) | 44/100 | 48/100 | -4 pts |
| Risk band | Moderate Risk | Moderate Risk | Ford Mondeo riskier |
| MOT fail rate | 31.0% | 32.9% | -1.9 pp |
| MOT tests in dataset | 899,971 | 380,533 | — |
| Failed tests | 278,613 | 125,054 | — |
| Avg defect severity | 1.05 | 1.07 | 1=std, 3=dangerous |
| vs UK fleet GVRI (37/100) | +7 pts above avg | +11 pts above avg | — |
GRCD = GVRI(A) − GVRI(B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, 0–100. Class-4 (car) normal tests only. N ≥ 30. Source: DVSA MOT 2016, OGL v3.0.
Try the live comparison tool
Compare any two UK cars head-to-head by Gera Risk Comparison Delta.
Car A
Car B
Select two cars to compare their Gera Risk Comparison Delta — computed from 26,016,787 real DVSA MOT tests.
Get insurance quotes for the Vauxhall Astra — lower-risk by 4 GVRI points
The Vauxhall Astra (GVRI 44/100) is 4 index points lower-risk than the Ford Mondeo from DVSA MOT data. GeraSure is building data-driven insurance comparison using real GVRI data. Join the waitlist to see what that means for your premium.
More Vauxhall Astra comparisons
More Ford Mondeo comparisons
Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo insurance risk: frequently asked questions
- What is the Gera Risk Comparison Delta for the Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo?
- The Gera Risk Comparison Delta (GRCD) for the Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo is -4 index points, computed from GVRI(Vauxhall Astra) = 44/100 and GVRI(Ford Mondeo) = 48/100. The Ford Mondeo is the higher-risk model by 4 GVRI points based on DVSA MOT 2016 data (OGL v3.0).
- What is the Vauxhall Astra GVRI?
- The Vauxhall Astra Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 44/100 (Moderate Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 31.0% from 899,971 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- What is the Ford Mondeo GVRI?
- The Ford Mondeo Gera Vehicle Risk Index (GVRI) is 48/100 (Moderate Risk), with a MOT fail rate of 32.9% from 380,533 class-4 DVSA MOT tests in 2016. The UK fleet average GVRI is 37/100.
- Which is cheaper to insure, the Vauxhall Astra or Ford Mondeo?
- Based on DVSA MOT data, the Vauxhall Astra (GVRI 44/100, Moderate Risk) has a lower modelled insurance risk than the Ford Mondeo (GVRI 48/100) by 4 index points — a 1.9 percentage-point MOT fail-rate difference. However, actual premiums also depend on driver age, no-claims bonus, postcode, annual mileage and policy type.
- How is the GRCD calculated?
- GRCD = GVRI(Car A) − GVRI(Car B). GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100. All inputs are from the DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results dataset (2016, OGL v3.0). Only make+model combinations with N ≥ 30 tests are included. Full methodology is on the Gera Risk Comparison Delta methodology page.
Methodology
The Gera Risk Comparison Delta for Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Mondeo is the difference between their GVRI scores: GRCD = GVRI(Vauxhall Astra) − GVRI(Ford Mondeo) = 44 − 48 = -4 pts. GVRI = 0.6 × MOT_fail_rate + 0.4 × avg_defect_severity_norm, min-max scaled 0–100, from DVSA Anonymised MOT Tests (class-4, 2016, OGL v3.0). Full formula and verification steps on the methodology page.
Contains public sector information published by Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: DVSA Anonymised MOT Test Results — DfT (2016, published 2016).